Constitution Questions and Answers
Q.
In what language was Magna Carta written, and to whom was it addressed?
A. It was written in Latin and was addressed "To the archbishops, bishops,
abbots, earls, barons, justices, foresters, sheriffs, reeves, ministers, and
to all bailiffs, and faithful subjects."
Q.
What part of the world was first called America?
A. The name "America" was first applied to Central Brazil, in honor
of Amerigo Vespucci, who claimed its discovery. It was first applied to the
whole known western world by Mercator, the geographer, in 1538.
Q.
When did the phrase, "The United States of America," originate?
A. The first known use of the formal term "United States of America"
was in the Declaration of Independence. Thomas Paine, in February, 1776, had
written of "Free and independent States of America." The terms "United
Colonies," "United Colonies of America," "United Colonies
of North America," and also "States," were used in 1775 and
1776.
Q.
How were deputies to the Constitutional Convention chosen?
A. They were appointed by the legislatures of the different States.
Q.
Were there any restrictions as to the number of deputies a State might send?
A. No.
Q.
Which State did not send deputies to the Constitutional Convention?
A. Rhode Island and Providence Plantations.
Q.
Were the other twelve States represented throughout the Constitutional Convention?
A. No. Two of the deputies from New York left on July 10, 1787, and after
that Hamilton, the third deputy, when he was in attendance did not attempt
to cast the vote of his State. The New Hampshire deputies did not arrive until
July 23, 1787; so that there never was a vote of more than eleven States.
Q.
Where and when did the deputies to the Constitutional Convention assemble?
A. In Philadelphia, in the State House where the Declaration of Independence
was signed. The meeting was called for May 14, 1787, but a quorum was not
present until May 25.
Q.
About how large was the population of Philadelphia?
A. The census of 1790 gave it 28,000; including its suburbs, about 42,000.
Q.
What was the average age of the deputies to the Constitutional Convention?
A. About 44.
Q.
Who were the oldest and youngest members of the Constitutional Convention?
A. Benjamin Franklin, of Pennsylvania, then 81; and Jonathan Dayton, of New
Jersey, 26.
Q.
How many lawyers were members of the Constitutional Convention?
A. There were probably 34, out of 55, who had at least made a study of the
law.
Q.
From what classes of society were the members of the Constitutional Convention
drawn?
A. In addition to the lawyers, there were soldiers, planters, educators, ministers,
physicians, financiers, and merchants.
Q.
How many members of the Constitutional Convention had been members of the
Continental Congress?
A. Forty, and two others were later members.
Q.
Were there any members of the Constitutional Convention who never attended
any of its meetings?
A. There were nineteen who were never present. Some of these declined, others
merely neglected the duty.
Q.
Were the members of the Constitutional Convention called "delegates"
or "deputies," and is there any distinction between the terms?
A. Some of the States called their representatives "delegates";
some, "deputies"; and some, "commissioners," the terms
being often mixed. In the Convention itself they were always referred to as
"deputies." Washington, for example, signed his name as "deputy
from Virginia." The point is simply that whatever they called themselves,
they were representatives of their States. The general practice of historians
is to describe them as "delegates."
Q.
Who was called the "Sage of the Constitutional Convention"?
A. Benjamin Franklin, of Pennsylvania.
Q.
Who was called the "Father of the Constitution"?
A. James Madison, of Virginia, because in point of erudition and actual contributions
to the formation of the Constitution he was preeminent.
Q.
Was Thomas Jefferson a member of the Constitutional Convention?
A. No. Jefferson was American Minister to France at the time of the Constitutional
Convention.
Q.
What did Thomas Jefferson have to do with framing the Constitution?
A. Although absent from the Constitutional Convention and during the period
of ratification, Jefferson rendered no inconsiderable service to the cause
of Constitutional Government, for it was partly through his insistence that
the Bill of Rights, consisting of the first ten amendments, was adopted.
Q.
Who presided over the Constitutional Convention?
A. George Washington, chosen unanimously.
Q.
How long did it take to frame the Constitution?
A. It was drafted in fewer than one hundred working days.
Q.
How much was paid for the journal kept by Madison during the Constitutional
Convention?
A. President Jackson secured from Congress in 1837 an appropriation of $30,000
with which to buy Madison's journal and other papers left by him.
Q.
Was there harmony in the Convention?
A. Serious conflicts arose at the outset, especially between those representing
the small and large States.
Q.
Who presented the Virginia Plan?
A. Edmund Randolph.
Q.
What was the Connecticut Compromise?
A. This was the first great compromise of the Constitutional Convention, whereby
it was agreed that in the Senate each State should have two members, and that
in the House the number of Representatives was to be based upon population.
Thus the rights of the small States were safeguarded, and the majority of
the population was to be fairly represented.
Q.
Who actually wrote the Constitution?
A. In none of the relatively meager records of the Constitutional Convention
is the literary authorship of any part of the Constitution definitely established.
The deputies debated proposed plans until, on July 24, 1787, substantial agreement
having been reached, a Committee of Detail was appointed, consisting of John
Rutledge, of South Carolina; Edmund Randolph, of Virginia; Nathaniel Gorham,
of Massachusetts; Oliver Ellsworth, of Connecticut; and James Wilson, of Pennsylvania,
who on August 6 reported a draft which included a Preamble and twenty-three
articles, embodying fifty-seven sections. Debate continued until September
8, when a new Committee of Style was named to revise the draft. This committee
included William Samuel Johnson, of Connecticut; Alexander Hamilton, of New
York; Gouverneur Morris, of Pennsylvania; James Madison, of Virginia; and
Rufus King, of Massachusetts, and they reported the draft in approximately
its final shape on September 12. The actual literary form is believed to be
largely that of Morris, and the chief testimony for this is in the letters
and papers of Madison, and Morris's claim. However, the document in reality
was builded slowly and laboriously, with not a piece of material included
until it has been shaped and approved. The preamble was written by the Committee
of Style.
Q.
Who was the penman who, after the text of the Constitution had been agreed
on, engrossed it prior to the signing?
A. Jacob Shallus who, at the time, was assistant clerk of the Pennsylvania
State Assembly, and whose office was in the same building in which the Convention
was held.
Q.
Does his name appear on the document or in any of the papers pertaining to
its preparation?
A. No. In the financial memoranda there is an entry of $30 for "clerks
employed to transcribe & engross."
Q.
When and how was the identity of the engrosser determined?
A. In 1937, on the occasion of the 150th anniversary of the Constitution.
His identity was determined after a long and careful search of collateral
public documents, and is here disclosed for the first time.
Q.
Where did Shallus do the engrossing?
A. There is no record of this, but probably in Independence Hall.
Q.
Did he realize the importance of the work he had done?
A. Probably not; when he died, in 1796, the Constitution had not yet come
to be the firmly established set of governmental principles it since has become.
Q.
Did some of the deputies to the Constitutional Convention refuse to sign the
Constitution?
A. Only thirty-nine signed. Fourteen deputies had departed for their homes,
and three--Randolph and Mason, of Virginia, and Gerry, of Massachusetts--refused
to sign. One of the signatures is that of an absent deputy, John Dickinson,
of Delaware, added at his request by George Read, who also was from Delaware.
Q.
How can it be said that the signing of the Constitution was unanimous, when
the deputies of only twelve States signed and some delegates refused to sign?
A. The signatures attest the "Unanimous Consent of the States present."
The voting was by States, and the vote of each State that of a majority of
its deputies. Hamilton signed this attestation for New York, though as he
was the only deputy of the State present he had not been able to cast the
vote of his State for the consent, only eleven States voting on the final
question. There is an even greater discrepancy about the Signers of the Declaration
of Independence. Some seven or eight members present on July 4 never signed;
seven Signers, including Richard Henry Lee, of Virginia, who proposed the
resolution of independence, were not present on the day; and eight other Signers
were not members of Congress until after July 4.
Q.
Did George Washington sign the Declaration of Independence?
A. No. He had been appointed Commander-in-Chief of the Continental Army more
than a year before and was at the time with the army in New York City.
Q.
What are the exact measurements of the originals of the Declaration of Independence
and of the Constitution of the United States?
A. The Declaration of Independence: 29 7/8 in. by 24 7/16 in.; The Constitution:
four sheets, approximately 28 3/4 in. by 23 5/8 in. each.
Q.
How many words are there in the texts in the present volume, and how long
does it take to read them?
A. The Constitution has 4,543 words, including the signatures but not the
certificate on the interlineations; and takes about half an hour to read.
The Declaration of Independence has 1,458 words, with the signatures, but
is slower reading, as it takes about ten minutes. The Farewell Address has
7,641 words and requires forty-five minutes to read.
Q.
What party names were given to those who favored ratification and to those
who opposed it?
A. Those who favored ratification were called Federalists; those who opposed,
Antifederalists.
Q.
In ratifying the Constitution, did the people vote directly?
A. No. Ratification was by special State conventions (Art. VII).
Q.
The vote of how many States was necessary to ratify the Constitution?
A. Nine (Art. VII).
Q.
In what order did the States ratify the Constitution?
A. In the following order: Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia, Connecticut,
Massachusetts, Maryland, South Carolina, New Hampshire, Virginia, and New
York. After Washington had been inaugurated, North Carolina and Rhode Island
ratified.
Q.
After the Constitution was submitted for ratification, where did the greatest
contests occur?
A. In Massachusetts, Virginia, and New York.
Q.
In each instance what was the vote?
A. New York ratified the Constitution by a majority of three votes 30 to 27;
Massachusetts by 187 to 168; and Virginia by 89 to 79.
Q.
In the course of ratification, how many amendments were offered by the State
conventions?
A. Seventy-eight; exclusive of Rhode Island's twenty-one, and those demanded
by the first convention in North Carolina. There were many others offered
which were considered necessary as items of a Bill of Rights. Professor Ames
gives 124 as the whole number, inclusive of those of Rhode Island and North
Carolina and the Bills of Rights. Various of these covered the same topics.
Q.
When did the United States government go into operation under the Constitution?
A. The Constitution became binding upon nine States by the ratification of
the ninth State, New Hampshire, June 21, 1788. Notice of this ratification
was received by Congress on July 2, 1788. On September 13, 1788, Congress
adopted a resolution declaring that electors should be appointed in the ratifying
States on the first Wednesday in January, 1789; that the electors vote for
President on the first Wednesday in February, 1789; and that "the first
Wednesday in March next [March 4, 1789] be the time and the present seat of
Congress the place for commencing proceedings under the said constitution."
The Convention had also suggested "that after such Publication the Electors
should be appointed, and the Senators and Representatives elected." The
Constitution left with the States the control over the election of congressmen,
and Congress said nothing about this in its resolution; but the States proceeded
to provide for it as well as for the appointment of electors. On March 3,
1789, the old Confederation went out of existence and on March 4 the new government
of the United States began legally to function, according to a decision of
the Supreme Court of the United States (wings v. Speed, 5 Wheat. 420); however,
it had no practical existence until April 6, when first the presence of quorums
in both Houses permitted organization of Congress. On April 30, 1789, George
Washington was inaugurated as President of the United States, so on that date
the executive branch of the government under the Constitution became operative.
But it was not until February 2, 1790, that the Supreme Court, as head of
the third branch of the government, organized and, held its first session;
so that is the date when our government under the Constitution became fully
operative.
Q.
Did Washington receive the unanimous vote of the electors in his first election
as President?
A. Yes, of all who voted. Four, two in Virginia and two in Maryland, did not
vote; and the eight votes to which New York was entitled were not cast because
the legislature could come to no agreement upon how the electors should be
appointed. There should have been 81 votes; he received 69.
Q.
How did the first inauguration proceed?
A. The Senate Journal narrates it as follows: "The House of Representatives,
preceded by their Speaker, came into the Senate Chamber, and took the seats
assigned them; and the joint Committee, preceded by their Chairman, agreeably
to order, introduced the President of the United States to the Senate Chamber,
where he was received by the Vice President, who conducted him to the Chair;
when the Vice President informed him, that 'The Senate and House of Representatives
were ready to attend him to take the oath required by the Constitution, and
that it would be administered by the Chancellor of the State of New-York'--To
which the President replied, he was ready to proceed:--and being attended
to the gallery in front of the Senate Chamber, by the Vice President and Senators,
the Speaker and Representatives, and the other public characters present,
the oath was administered.--After which the Chancellor proclaimed, 'Long live
George Washington, President of the United States.' The President having returned
to his seat, after a short pause, arose and addressed the Senate and House
of Representatives . . . The President, the Vice President, the Senate and
House of Representatives, &c. then proceeded to St. Paul's Chapel, where
divine service was performed by the Chaplain of Congress, after which the
President was conducted to his house, by the Committee appointed for that
purpose."
Q.
Was Adams sworn in as Vice President before Washington took the oath of office
as President?
A. No. Neither the Vice President nor any Senators took the oath of office
until June 3. The first act of Congress, June 1, provided for the oath. In
the House the Speaker and members present on April 8 had taken an oath provided
for by a resolve on April 6 of that House, and the act of June 1 recognized
that oath as sufficient for those who had taken it.
Q.
What cities have been capitals of the United States government?
A. The Continental Congress sat at Philadelphia, 1774-76, 1777, 1778-83; Baltimore,
1776-77; Lancaster, 1777; York, 1777-78; Princeton, 1783; Annapolis, 1783-84;
Trenton, 1784; and New York, 1785-89. The first capital under the Constitution
of the United States was in New York, but in 1790 it was moved to Philadelphia.
Here it was continued until 1800, when the permanent capital, Washington,
in the new District of Columbia, was occupied.
Q.
How was the manner of address of the President of the United States decided?
A. Both Houses of Congress appointed committees to consider the proper title
to give the President, but they could not agree. The Senate wished it to be
"His Highness the President of the United States of America and Protector
of their Liberties." The House considered this as too monarchical, and
on May 5 addressed its reply to the inaugural speech merely to "The President
of the United States." The Senate on May 14 agreed to this simple form.
Q.
What is meant by the term "constitution"?
A. A constitution embodies the fundamental principles of a government. Our
constitution, adopted by the sovereign power, is amendable by that power only.
To the constitution all laws, executive actions, and, judicial decisions must
conform, as it is the creator of the powers exercised by the departments of
government.
Q.
Why has our Constitution been classed as "rigid"?
A. The term "rigid" is used in opposition to "flexible"
because the provisions are in a written document which cannot be legally changed
with the same ease and in the same manner as ordinary laws. The British Constitution,
which is unwritten, can, on the other hand, be changed overnight by act of
Parliament.
Q.
What was W. E. Gladstone's famous remark about the Constitution?
A. It was as follows: "As the British Constitution is the most subtle
organism which has proceeded from the womb and long gestation of progressive
history, so the American Constitution is, so far as I can see, the most wonderful
work ever struck off at a given time by the brain and purpose of man."
Q.
What is the source of the philosophy found in the Constitution?
A. The book which had the greatest influence upon the members of the Constitutional
Convention was Montesquieu's Spirit of Laws, which first appeared in 1748.
The great French philosopher had, however, in turn borrowed much of his doctrine
from the Englishman John Locke, with whose writings various members of the
Convention were also familiar.
Q.
Are there original ideas of government in the Constitution?
A. Yes; but its main origins lie in centuries of experience in government,
the lessons of which were brought over from England and further developed
through the practices of over a century and a half in the colonies and early
State governments, and in the struggles of the Continental Congress. Its roots
are deep in the past; and its endurance and the obedience and respect it has
won are mainly the result of the slow growth of its principles from before
the days of Magna Carta.
Q.
What state papers should be considered in connecting the Constitution of the
United States with Magna Carta?
A. The Great Charter was confirmed several times by later medieval monarchs,
and there were various statutes, such as those of Westminster, which also
helped to develop the germs of popular government. The Petition of Right,
1628, against the abuse of the royal prerogative, the Habeas Corpus Act, 1679,
and the Bill of Rights, 1689, to establish the claims of the Petition, are
the great English documents of more modern times on popular freedom. Meanwhile,
the colonial charters became the foundation of the Americans' claim to the
"rights of Englishmen," and were the predecessors of the State Constitutions,
which owed their origin to the American Revolution. The Declaration of Independence
established the principles which the Constitution made practical. Plans for
colonial union were proposed from time to time, the most important of them
being the Albany Plan of 1754, of which Benjamin Franklin was the author.
The united efforts to establish independence gave birth to the Articles of
Confederation, which though inadequate, were a real step toward the "more
perfect Union" of the Constitution.
Q.
In what respect had the Confederation failed?
A. It had three great weaknesses. It had no means of revenue independent of
that received through its requisitions on the States, which were nothing more
than requests, which the States could and did disregard; and it had no control
over foreign or interstate commerce. Behind these lacks was its inability
to compel the States to honor the national obligations. It could make treaties
but had no means to compel obedience to them; or to provide for the payment
of the foreign debt. It had responsibility but no power as a national government;
no means of coercing the States to obedience even to the very inadequate grant
given to the "League of Friendship" by the Articles of Confederation.
But its greatest weakness was that it had no direct origin in, or action on,
the people themselves; but, unlike both the Declaration of Independence and
the later Constitution, knew only the States and was known only to them, calling
them sovereign.
Q.
How extensively has the Constitution been copied?
A. All later Constitutions show its influence; it has been copied extensively
throughout the world.
Q.
The United States government is frequently described as one of limited powers.
Is this true?
A. Yes. The United States government possesses only such powers as are specifically
granted to it by the Constitution.
Q.
Then how does it happen that the government constantly exercises powers not
mentioned by the Constitution?
A. Those powers simply flow from general provisions. To take a simple example,
the Constitution gives to the United States the right to coin money. It would
certainly follow, therefore, that the government had the right to make the
design for the coinage. This is what the Supreme Court calls "reasonable
construction" of the Constitution (Art.
I, sec. 8, cl. 18).
Q.
Where, in the Constitution, is there mention of education?
A. There is none; education is a matter reserved for the States.
Q.
Who was called the "Expounder of the Constitution"?
A. Daniel Webster, of Massachusetts, because of his forceful and eloquent
orations interpreting the document.
Q.
Must a member of the House of Representatives be a resident of the district
which he represents?
A. The Constitution provides only that no person shall be a representative
"who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which
he shall be chosen"; but makes no requirement as to residence within
the district (Art.
I, sec. 2, cl. 2).
Q.
Is it possible to impeach a justice of the Supreme Court?
A. It is possible to impeach a Justice of the Supreme Court or any other official.
The Constitution makes provision for impeachment by the House and trial of
the accused by the Senate sitting as a court of "all civil Officers,"
which includes the Justices (Art.
I, sec. 2, cl. 5; sec.
3, cl. 6, 7; Art.
II, sec. 4).
Q.
Are Senators, Representatives, and justices of the Supreme Court civil officials
of the United. States?
A. Justices are, but the others are probably not. The Constitution in several
places seems to make a clear distinction between legislators and officials,
though this has been contested. Members of Congress are not subject to impeachment,
but are liable to expulsion by the vote of the House of which they are members
(Art.
I, sec. 5, cl. 2).
Q.
What would be the proceeding in case of the impeachment of a Cabinet officer?
A. An impeachment proceeding may be set in motion in the House of Representatives
by charges made on the floor on the responsibility of a member or territorial
delegate; by charges preferred by a memorial, which is usually referred to
a committee for examination; by charges transmitted by the legislature of
a State or from a grand jury; or the facts developed and reported by an investigating
committee of the House. After the impeachment has been voted by the House,
the case is heard by the Senate sitting as a court. When the President of
the United States is impeached and tried, the proceedings are the same except
that the Senate is then presided over by the Chief Justice of the United States
(Art.
I, sec. 2, cl. 5; sec.
3, cl. 6, 7; Art.
II, sec. 4).
Q.
What is meant when it is said that Senators are paired?
A. Sometimes a Senator belonging to one party agrees with a Senator belonging
to the other party that neither will vote if the other is absent, the theory
being that they would always vote on opposite sides of the question. This
is called a pair. Sometimes pairs are secured on a particular vote only. For
example, if a Senator is in favor of a certain piece of legislation and is
ill or unavoidably detained, his friends arrange for some one on the opposite
side not to vote. This insures for each a record as to his views. While many
are opposed to general pairs, as the first is called, all are glad to arrange
a pair for a specific measure if a Senator is unavoidably prevented from being
present (Art.
I, sec. 5, cl. 2).
Q.
What is the mace of the House of Representatives and what purpose does it
serve?
A. The mace consists of thirteen ebony rods, about three feet long, representing
the thirteen original States. It is bound together with silver in imitation
of the thongs which bound the fasces of ancient Rome. The shaft is surmounted
by a globe of solid silver about five inches in diameter upon which rests
a massive silver eagle. The mace is the symbol of the paramount authority
of the House within its own sphere. In times of riot or disorder upon the
floor the Speaker may direct the Sergeant-at-Arms, the executive officer of
the House, to bear the mace up and down the aisles as a reminder that the
dignity and decorum of the House must not be overthrown. Defiance to such
warning is the ultimate disrespect to the House and may lead to expulsion.
When the House is sitting as a body the mace rests upright on a pedestal at
the right of the Speaker's dais; when the House is sitting in committee of
the whole, the mace stands upon the floor at the foot of its pedestal. Thus,
when the House wishes to "rise" from committee of the whole and
resume business as a legislative body, lifting the mace to its pedestal automatically
effects the transition. The origin of the idea of the mace is based upon a
similar emblem in the British House of Commons (Art.
I, sec. 5, cl. 2).
Q.
Who administers the oath of office to the Speaker of the House of Representatives?
A. It is usually administered by the oldest member in point of service (Art.
I, sec. 5, cl. 2).
Q.
What is meant by the "Father" of the House of Representatives?
A. It is a colloquial title informally bestowed upon the oldest member in
point of service (Art.
I, sec. 5, cl. 2). It was borrowed originally from the House of Commons.
Q.
Why is a member of the House of Representatives referred to on the floor as
"the gentleman from New York," for example, instead of by name?
A. It is a custom in all large deliberative bodies to avoid the use of the
personal name in debate or procedure. The original purpose of this was to
avoid any possible breach of decorum and to separate the political from the
personal character of each member (Art.
I, sec. 6, cl. 1).
Q.
Do members of Congress get extra compensation for their work on committees?
A. No. (Art.
I, sec. 6, cl. 1).
Q.
Could members of the President's Cabinet be permitted to sit in Congress without
amending the Constitution?
A. No. A national officeholder cannot at the same time be a member of either
House of Congress (Art.
1, sec. 6, cl. 2).
Q.
Must all revenue and appropriation bills originate in the House of Representatives?
A. The Constitution provides that all bills for raising revenue shall originate
in the House of Representatives. It is customary for appropriation bills to
originate there also (Art.
I, sec. 7, cl. 1).
Q.
What is meant by the word veto, in the President's powers?
A. The word is from the Latin and means "I forbid." The President
is authorized by the Constitution to refuse his assent to a bill presented
by Congress if for any reason he disapproves of it. Congress may, however,
pass the act over his veto but it must be by a two-thirds majority in both
houses. If Congress adjourns before the end of the 10 days, the President
can prevent the enactment of the bill by merely not signing it. This is called
a pocket veto. (Art.
I, sec. 7, cl. 2).
Q.
If, after a bill has passed both houses of Congress and gone to the President,
Congress desires to recall it, can this be done?
A. A bill which has reached the President may be recalled only by concurrent
resolution. The form used is as follows: Resolved, by the House of Representatives
(the Senate concurring), That the President be requested to return to the
House of Representatives the bill . . . (title). After the concurrent resolution
passes both houses it is formally transmitted to the President. The latter
might, however, have already signed it, in which case it would have become
a law and would have to be repealed in regular fashion (Art.
I, sec. 7, cl. 2).
Q.
What is the difference between a joint and a concurrent resolution of Congress?
A. A joint resolution has the same force as an act, and must be signed by
the President or passed over his veto. A concurrent resolution is not a law,
but only a measure on which the two Houses unite for a purpose concerned with
their organization and procedure, or expressions of facts, principles, opinions,
and purposes, "matters peculiarly within the province of Congress alone,"
and not embracing "legislative provisions proper" (Art.
1, sec. 7, cl. 3).
Q.
Which is the longest term of office in the government, aside from judges?
A. The Comptroller General of the United States and the Assistant Comptroller
General have the longest tenure. They hold office for fifteen years (Art.
I, sec. 8), cl. 18; sec.
9, cl. 7; Art.
II, sec. 2, cl. 2).
Q.
What is the term of office of Treasurer of the United States?
A. The Treasurer is appointed by the President of the United States, and no
length of term of office is specified (Art.
I, sec. 8, cl. 18; sec.
9, cl. 7; Art.
II, sec. 2, cl. 2).
Q.
Does the Constitution provide for the formation of a Cabinet?
A. No. The Constitution vests the executive power in the President. Executive
departments were created by successive acts of Congress under authority conferred
by the Constitution in Art.
I, sec. 8, cl. 18. The Departments of State, Treasury, and War were created
by the first session of the First Congress. The Secretaries of these, together
with the Attorney General, formed the first President's Cabinet. The Cabinet,
it should be distinctly understood, is merely an advisory body whose members
hold office only during the pleasure of the President. It has no constitutional
function as a Cabinet, and the word does not appear in an act of Congress
until February 26, 1907 (Art.
I, sec. 8, cl. 18; Art.
II, sec. 1, cl. 1, sec.
2, cl. 1).
Q.
How many methods of electing the President of the United States were considered
by the Constitutional Convention?
A. Five. These were by the Congress; by the people; by State legislatures;
by State executives; and by electors. Various methods of appointing the electors
were proposed: by popular vote, by lottery from members of Congress, by State
legislatures, and by State executives; and the matter was finally compromised
by leaving the method to each State legislature. The meeting of the electors
in one body was also proposed; and at first the final choice, in case election
by electors failed, was given to the Senate, but later, after choice by Congress
had been defeated, it was transferred to the House, voting by States.
Q.
Who appoints the Chief Justice of the United States and for how long a term?
A. The Chief Justice of the United States and the Associate Justices are appointed
for life (during good behavior) by the President of the United States, "by
and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate," (Art.
II, sec. 2, cl. 2; Art.
III, sec. 1).
Q.
By what authority may the President of the United States call an extra session
of Congress?
A. The Constitution provides for this. Art.
II, sec. 3, says: ". . . he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene
both Houses, or either of them, . . ."
Q.
Can the Secretary of State take action with respect to recognizing a government
without the consent of Congress?
A. The Secretary of State, on behalf of the President, may accord recognition
without recourse to Congress (Art.
II, sec. 3).
Q.
Under the new government how was the national judiciary organized?
A. The First Congress passed many notable acts which endured many years as
laws. One of the most worthy of these was that organizing the national judiciary,
September 24, 1789. The bill was drawn up with extraordinary ability by Senator
Oliver Ellsworth, of Connecticut, who had been a deputy to the Constitutional
Convention, and who was to become Chief Justice of the United States. The
Constitution prescribes a Supreme Court, but left its make-up and provision
for other courts to Congress. The Supreme Court was organized with a Chief
Justice and five Associates; a district court was provided for each State;
and the Supreme Court Justices sat with the district judges in circuit courts.
The jurisdiction of the three grades of the judiciary was fixed, and officers--clerks,
marshals, and district attorneys--authorized. The Attorney General, also provided
for in the act, was for many years little more than the President's legal
adviser. Under this law President Washington appointed John Jay, of New York,
Chief Justice, and the judiciary was organized on February 2, 1790.
Q.
What are the correct style and titles of the Supreme Court of the United States
and its members?
A. The correct title for the Supreme Court is "The Supreme Court of the
United States"; for the members, one speaks of a Justice, or Associate
Justice, of the Supreme Court of the United States, but always of the head
of the court as "The Chief Justice of the United States" (Art.
III, sec. I).
Q.
What has been the number of Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States?
A. The Chief Justice is mentioned in the Constitution but the number of Justices
is not specified. The act of September 24, 1789, provided for a Chief Justice
and five Associates; that of February 24, 1807, made the Associates six; that
of March 3, 1837, eight; and that of March 3, 1863, nine. But on July 23,
1866, a law directed that no appointments be made of Associate Justices until
the number of them should be only six. This was to prevent President Johnson
from making appointments; but the act of April 10, 1869, restored the number
to eight. There were only six at the time that President Grant made the first
restorative appointments.
Q.
It is frequently asserted that the Supreme Court nullifies an act of Congress.
Is this correct?
A. No. The Court has repeatedly declared that it claims no such power. All
it does--all it can do--is to examine a law when a suit is brought before
it. If the law in question is in accordance with the Constitution, in the
opinion of the Supreme Court, the law stands. If the law goes beyond powers
granted by the Constitution, then it is no law, and the Supreme Court merely
states that fact (Art.
III, sec. 2, cl. 1; Art.
VI, cl. 2).
Q.
In which decision did the Supreme Court first formally assert its authority
contrary to an act of Congress?
A. In the famous case of Marbury v. Madison (1803). This was
not the first case in which the authority of an act of Congress was questioned
in a case before the court. In Hylton v. United States, 1796,
the court upheld the constitutionality of a national tax on carriages as an
excise that did not have to be apportioned. Also Justices in the circuit court
had, as early as 1792, refused to act as commissioners under an act of Congress,
considering the law unconstitutional.
Q.
What is treason against the United States?
A. Treason against the United States consists in levying war against them,
or in adhering to their enemies, giving the latter aid and comfort. No person
can be convicted of treason except upon the testimony of two witnesses to
the same overt act or on confession in open court (Art.
III, sec. 3, cl. 1).
Q.
What right has a Territorial Delegate in Congress?
A. A Territorial Delegate sits in the House of Representatives from each organized
territory. Delegates may be appointed to committees and have the right to
speak on any subject, but not to vote (Art.
IV, sec. 3, cl. 2).
Q.
Is a constitutional amendment submitted to the President?
A. No. A resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution, after having
passed both houses of Congress by a two-thirds vote, does not go to the President
for his signature. It is sent to the States to be ratified either by their
legislatures or by conventions, as Congress shall determine (Art.
V). The Supreme Court as early as 1798 declared the approval was not requisite
(Hollingsworth v. Virginia, 3 Dallas 378).
Q.
What constitutes the supreme law of the land?
A. Art. VI, cl. 2 of the Constitution says: "This Constitution, and the
Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all
Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States,
shalt be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall
be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the
Contrary notwithstanding."
Q.
When referring to various States in the Union, is the term "sovereign
States" correct?
A. No. A sovereign is that person or State which recognizes no superior. The
States of the Union have a superior--the Constitution of the United States,
which is "the supreme Law of the Land . . . any Thing in the Constitution
or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding" (Art.
VI, cl. 2).
Q.
Is there a clause in the Constitution prohibiting members of certain religious
denominations from becoming President of the United States?
A. No. Art.
VI, cl. 3 of the Constitution provides that "no religious Test shall
ever be required as a Qualification to any Office of public Trust under the
United States."
Q.
Should the amendments be called articles?
A. The amendments proposed by the first Congress were sent out as "Articles
in addition to, and Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of
America," and the term "article" is used in self-application
in all the amendments since the Twelfth, except the Seventeenth, which uses
the term "amendment." This would seem to give official sanction
to calling the amendments "articles," but as it causes some confusion,
they are better placed by the use of "amendment" only, with the
proper number.
Q.
In the first session of the First Congress how many proposed amendments were
considered?
A. All of the amendments proposed by the State conventions were considered,
but only approximately 90 separate amendments were formally introduced. Professor
Ames lists 312 through the First Congress, which includes the 124 proposed
by the States and all reports and amendments to those proposed, in Congress.
Q.
Who proposed the creation of the first executive departments and the first
amendments to the Constitution?
A. James Madison, of Virginia, proposed the resolutions for the formation
of the first executive departments and the series of twelve amendments to
the Constitution of which ten were finally ratified by the States.
Q.
What constitutes the Bill
of Rights?
A. The first ten amendments to the Constitution.
Q.
It is said that when the first amendments to the Constitution were submitted,
there were twelve, of which ten were adopted. What were the other two about?
A. The two amendments of the twelve submitted as the Bill of Rights which
were rejected were the one which related to the apportionment of Representatives
in Congress and the one fixing the compensation of members of Congress. (Note:
The rejected second amendment was ratified on May 7,1992 as the 27th amendment.)
Q.
Do the first ten amendments bind the States?
A. No. They restrict the powers of the national government. They do not bind
the States; but various of their restrictions have been applied to the States
by the Fourteenth
Amendment.
Q.
Does not the Constitution give us our rights and liberties?
A. No, it does not, it only guarantees them. The people had all their rights
and liberties before they made the Constitution. The Constitution was formed,
among other purposes, to make the people's liberties secure-- secure
not only as against foreign attack but against oppression by their own government.
They set specific limits upon their national government and upon the States,
and reserved to themselves all powers that they did not grant. The Ninth
Amendment declares: "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain
rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the
people."
Q.
What protection is given to a person accused of crime under the jurisdiction
of the United States?
A. The Fifth
Amendment declares that no person, except one serving in the land or naval
forces or the militia in time of war or public danger, can be held to answer
for a capital or other infamous crime unless on a presentment or indictment
of a grand jury. No person can be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb for
the same offense. No one in a criminal case can be compelled to be a witness
against himself, or be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due
process of law. Private property cannot be taken for public use without just
compensation. By the Eighth Amendment excessive bail and fines and cruel and
unusual punishments are prohibited. The original Constitution forbids ex post
facto laws and bills of attainder, limits the punishment for treason, protects
the right to a writ of habeas corpus, and secures trial by jury.
Q.
Is the right to speedy trial guaranteed?
A. Yes. The Sixth
Amendment expressly states that in all criminal prosecutions the accused
shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury within
the district of the crime, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the
accusation. He is entitled to be confronted with the witnesses against him,
to be allowed to compel the attendance of witnesses in his favor, and to have
the assistance of counsel for his defense.
Q.
Is the right of trial by jury in civil cases also assured?
A. Yes. Amendment
Seven preserves the right of trial by jury in suits of common law involving
the value of more than twenty dollars.
Q.
What has been the longest period during which no amendment has been added
to the Constitution?
A. Sixty-one years, from 1804 to 1865. This period elapsed between the Twelfth
and Thirteenth Amendments.
Q.
How long did it take the States to ratify the income tax amendment?
A. The Sixteenth
Amendment was proposed to the States on July 12, 1909, deposited with
the Secretary of State on July 21, ratified by the thirty-sixth state on February
3, 1913, and, declared ratified on February 25, 1913.
Q.
It has been stated that the Prohibition Amendment was the first instance of
incorporating a statute in the Constitution. Is this so?
A. No. Those portions of the Constitution which specifically dealt with slavery
and the slave trade (Art.
I, sec. 9, cl. 1; Art.
IV, sec. 2, cl. 3 ) were both of this character. They were made obsolete
by time limit in one case and the Civil War in the other.
Q.
How many amendments to the Constitution have been repealed?
A. Only one -- the Eighteenth
(Prohibition).
Q.
How is an amendment repealed?
A. By adding another amendment.
Q.
If the Eighteenth Amendment is repealed, why is it necessary to call the new
one repealing it the Twenty-first?
A. The Eighteenth
Amendment will indeed remain in the Constitution, but a notation will
be added to the effect that it is repealed by the Twenty-first.
Q.
What is the Twentieth
Amendment and when was it adopted?
A. This is the so-called "Lame Duck" Amendment, which changes the
time for the beginning of the terms of the President, Vice President, and
the members of Congress. The term of the President and Vice President begins
on January 20, and that of members of Congress on January 3. It was adopted
upon the ratification by the thirty-sixth State, January 23, 1933, and certified
in effect on February 6.
Q.
Why was a constitutional amendment necessary to change the date of the beginning
of the terms of President, Vice President, and members of Congress?
A. The Constitution fixes the terms of President and, Vice President at four
years, of Senators at six years, and of Representatives at two years. Any
change of date would affect the terms of the incumbents. It was therefore
necessary to amend the Constitution to make the change.
Q.
If the President-elect dies, who becomes President at the beginning of the
term for which he was elected?
A. The Twentieth
Amendment provides that in this case the Vice President-elect shall become
President.
Q.
Does the Twentieth Amendment do away with the Electoral College?
A. It does not.
Q.
It takes how many States to block an amendment?
A. Thirteen, without respect to population or importance; but while approval
is considered final, rejection is not while within the time limit, if one
is prescribed by the amendment.
| DreamWeaver | Photoshop |
judi
09/16/05 (09/28/05) |