Denise Wenger
Math and Science Methods
Microteach
April 5, 1999
Title of Lesson: Ice Preservation Race
Standards: Science (Heat, Application)
Math (Computation, Reasoning)
Learning Styles: Kinesthetic, Logical/Mathematical, Verbal/Linguistic, Interpersonal, Visual/Spatial
Objectives:
LOOKS LIKE SOUNDS LIKE
| Hands, feet and other objects kept to self | Positive comments pertaining to the subject |
| Everyone is active | One voice per group at a time |
| Minimal unnecessary movement | Medium voices |
Student Level: 3rd 4th
Time Required: 30 minutes for session one and 30 minutes for session two (approximately five hours later)
Background Information:
Prerequisite Information:
Materials: Ice cubes (same size)
Plastic Baggies
Styrofoam cups
One type of conductor or insulation per group:
Paper
Cloth
Plastic
Foil
Packing peanuts
Paper towels
Group Size: 3 students
Roles: Keeper of the Cube
Computation Guide
Presentation Advisor
All students are motivators!
Introduction of Lesson: Why do we use ice cubes? What would happen if we didn't use ice cubes? How long do you think it would take for this ice cube to melt if I just left it out on the table?
Development of Concept:
1. Discuss why ice melts. How does heat energy play a role in this process?
2. What is conduction? How is conduction an active part of the ice cube melting process?
3. Discuss the T-chart concerning communication during group work.
Positive Interdependence: Each student will have a role. During the presentation, each group member must add at least one positive comment concerning the group's method of ice preservation.
Individual Accountability: Each student will be responsible for his or her part in the group presentation as well as for performing his or her individual role to the best of his or her ability.
Criteria for Success: Each group may use only their type of insulation or conductor, but may use materials found in and around the classroom (with teacher permission.)
Expected Behaviors: Students will demonstrate appropriate communication skills in accordance with the t-chart.
Monitoring: Students will complete a self-evaluation, assessing how well they each worked with their respective group.
Processing: As a whole, each group will discuss and explain whether their material was a conductor or an insulator and will explain to the class in a mini-presentation how this effected their ice cubes preservation.
Conclusion: As an entire class, discuss what materials worked best at insulating the ice cube. Brainstorm what materials could have been used to prevent the ice cube from melting. Did any group do something that helped or hindered their ice cube's preservation?
Evaluation: Using the students' self-evaluation as well as monitoring group work, the teacher will assess each group's completion of the task.
Friedl, A.E. (1997). Teaching science to children, an inquiry approach. New York: The
McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Hoover, E. & Mercier, S. (1990).Melt an Ice Cube. In Primary physics, activities
integrating math and science (pp. 80-83). Fresno: California: AIMS Education Foundation.
Student Self-evaluation
I actively participated in my group's activity. J K L
I added only positive comments to my group's discussion.
J K L
I performed my role to the best of my abilities. J K L
I listened when other group members shared comments.
J K L
| PREVIOUS | |||
| Lesson Index | Taggart's Page | TE |