| Course description: "Origins and
Implications of the Knowledge Society involves understanding the
historical origins and the current and future implications of the
information revolution that is unfolding. As our society ushers
in the information revolution, a deeper understanding of new ways of
knowing will serve as a catalyst for the future. Substantial
changes in the social, political, educational, and economic contexts
are the destined targets of the information/knowledge shift. This
course focuses on where these changes come from, what the likely
changes will be, and the utility of such changes on the way we know,
learn, and grow." |
This course is
writing-intensive. You are not likely to succeed in this course
unless you devote several hours each day to the course. Please
familiarize yourself with the Course Calendar, which is posted in the
"Assignments" section of Blackboard. The Course Calendar lists
due dates for all of the assignments. Completion of the
assignments are meant to help you achieve the course's expected
learning outcomes. The expected
learning outcomes of this class are:
A. To determine the subject matter and theme of an individual work.
B. To recognize the conclusions of a given work and determine whether
the conclusions are warranted.
C. To improve the student's ability to differentiate between knowledge
and data.
D. To enhance the student's ability to understand the importance and
uses of knowledge in an emerging knowledge paradigm.
E. To improve the ability to read and write critically and at an
advanced level.
F. To improve the ability to frame and develop an argument logically
dependent on the context.
G. To increase the level of information literacy and research acumen to
make informed choices and conduct lifelong learning.
H. To develop the ability to deal with ambiguity in problems which have
no right or wrong answers.
These learning outcomes are a
subset of the expected learning outcomes of the MLS program.
My e-mail address: amorin@fhsu.edu
My phone number: 785 628-5578
Required
texts
Vannevar Bush.
April 1945. "As We
May Think." The Atlantic
Monthly
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/194507/bush
Theodore
Kaczynski. 1995.* The
Unabomber (or
Unabomber's) Manifesto http://cyber.eserver.org/unabom.txt
*The date comes from Wikipedia's article, "Theodore Kacynski"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unabomber
Peter
F. Drucker. 1994. Post-Capitalist Society. isbn: 0-88730-661-6
Simon Head.
2005. The New Ruthless
Economy: Work and Power in the Digital Age. isbn:
0195179838
Catherine L.
Mann (with Jacob Funk Kirkegaard). 2006. Accelerating the Globalization of
America The Role for Information Technology. isbn:
0-88132-390-X
Francis
Fukuyama. 2002. Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the
Biotechnology Revolution. ISBN: 0-312-42171-0
Recorded
Lectures (required)
There
are 23 recorded lectures, or modules, available on DVD. The
schedule for
viewing these lectures is listed in the Course Calendar, which is
posted in the
"Assignments" section of the course's Blackboard website.
Suggested
articles
Yo Takatsuki. December 27, 2006. "Dealing with
toxic computer waste." BBC News
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/6110018.stm
Mark Ward. January 2, 2008. "Boom times
for hi-tech criminals." BBC News
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7154187.stm
Steven McKenzie. July 30, 2008. "Wull-E:
Robots doing dirty work [cleaning up nuclear sites]." BBC News
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/highlands_and_islands/7531632.stm
Course
Assignments
A
Course Calendar listing assignment due dates
can
be found as an attachment in the “Assignments” section of the course’s
Blackboard website. Each assignment must be submitted no later
than midnight Central Daylight Time of its due date. No
assignment
will be accepted
after its due date, unless circumstances warrant it.
FIRST
ASSIGNMENT: INTRODUCE YOURSELF.
Worth 200 points.
Check the Course Calendar for the due date.
You must complete this assignment in order to pass the class. This assignment should be at least one
page (single-spaced) in length. Post your introduction in
the "introduction" forum in the "Discussion
Board" section of the course's Blackboard site to introduce
yourself to others in the class. Tell us:
THIRD
ASSIGNMENT: RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS POSTED ON BLACKBOARD
Worth 1,000 points. Due dates will be given during the semester.
Questions will be posted on blackboard throughout the semester.
You are required to respond to each question, and you are required
'dialog' with at least two other students who have posted a response to
a particular question. Here is an example of a 'dialog:' (a)
Student One posts a response to a question; (b) you comment; (c)
Student One responds; (d) you respond. Your initial comment (part
"b" of the example) must focus on (i) what you have learned from the
response and (ii) an elaboration or criticism of what Student One has
written.
Related to learning outcomes A, B, E, F, and H.
FOURTH
ASSIGNMENT: CRITIQUES OF THREE OF THE ASSIGNED BOOKS
Worth 900 points. Check the Course calendar for due dates.
Critique each of the following books: Drucker, Head, and
Mann. In each critique, include a consideration of (a) the author's argument and
conclusion(s); (b) whether
the evidence substantiated the author's argument and conclusion(s); (c) implications of the author's argument
and conclusions; and (d) the quality of the writing. (The preceding
list draws upon the list presented by Dr. Paul Faber in IDS 801.)
Each critique must be two pages in length; no longer and no shorter
than two pages (single-spaced, 12-point New Times Roman font; one-inch
margins). For each of these three books, students will be
required to post a comment on the critiques of at least two other
students. Each comment must consider the following: (a) what the
student learned from the critique, and (b) weaknesses of the critique,
such as: important insights were missing, quality of analysis was poor,
and quality of writing was poor.
Related to learning outcomes A, B, E, F. and H.
FIFTH
ASSIGNMENT: MINI-RESEARCH PAPER ON THE DIGITAL DIVIDE
Worth 3,000 points. Check
the Course Calendar for the due date of the mini-research paper.
Resources you are required to use for this paper are: the lecture by
professor Mark Bannister, Chapter 18 in Webster's book, and information
from the CIA's World Factbook
(which can be found on the
CIA's webpage: https://www.cia.gov). This research paper must have ten
sources not used in the class and must be at least ten pages in length,
not including the title page and "References" section (double-spaced,
12-point New Times Roman font, one-inch margins). Follow the APA
guidelines and the guidelines listed below when writing your
paper. If there is a conflict between APA guidelines and the
guidelines below, follow the guidelines below. Whenever APA
guidelines conflict with guidelines that I provide, follow my
guidelines. You are required to submit a first draft no later
than Friday, November 19, 2008. You should treat the first draft
as if it is the final version of the paper - in other words, it should
be your best work. I will provide comments, as will other
students. You are required to submit a revised version of the
paper after considering these comments. (You are responsible for correcting all
errors in the first draft, even those I miss.) It is the revised
version that will receive a grade: failure to turn in a revised
version will result in the grade of zero on the paper. The due date for the revised version of
the paper is December 10, 2008. More information about this paper
will be given to you once the fall semester has started.
Related to learning outcomes C, D, E. F, G, and H.
Sources related to the Sixth Assignment
Dena Taylor and Margaret Proctor. Site
last modified May 27, 2008. The literature
review: A few tips on how to conduct it. Accessed July 31, 2008
http://www.utoronto.ca/writing/litrev.html
SIXTH
ASSIGNMENT: CRITIQUES OF MINI-RESEARCH PAPERS
Worth 600 points (200 points each). Check the Course Calendar for the due date
of the critiques.
You will be assigned three
mini-research papers that you will be required to critique. Base
each critique on the evaluation form posted in the "Assignments"
section of Blackboard (if you
use the form, also include commentary). Post each critique under the
mini-research paper about which the critique was written. Related
to learning outcomes A, B, D, E, G, and H.
SEVENTH
ASSIGNMENT: RESPONDING TO CRITIQUES OF YOUR MINI-RESEARCH
PAPER.
Worth 600 points (200 points each). Check the Course Calendar for the due date
of the responses.
Respond to each of the three
critiques of your mini-research paper.
Related to learning outcomes E, F, and H.
3. Begin writing the paper. Don't be afraid to write the
middle before
you write the beginning and end. Don't be afraid to
revise.
In fact, the less you revise, the more likely you are to have problems
with
your paper. You might find it helpful to create an outline at
some point
in the process that will help you understand the direction and emphasis
of your
paper. See also http://www.fhsu.edu/~amorin/MLS_Writing.html
4. Research, write, revise, write, revise, think, think, think,
write,
revise; consult with me if you wish.
5. Write the paper. Assume that the audience for the paper is
relatively intelligent but has NOT taken IDS 803.
6. Check citations and quotes for accuracy. When citing
sources, use either in-text citation technique, end-notes, or
footnotes. Don’t plagiarize –
see http://www.fhsu.edu/~amorin/MLS_Plagiarism.html.
See also FHSU’s academic honesty policy at http://web.fhsu.edu/universitycatalog/gen/academichonesty.asp.
Make sure to use quote marks when you are quoting. Follow the
‘string of
four’ rule (which is: use quote marks when you use four or more of the
same
words in the same order as found in a source you used). Include a
citation in the following instances: whenever you quote (include
the
citation immediately after the quote), whenever you use information or
an idea
that you got from someone else, and whenever you paraphrase or
summarize someone's
argument, information, etc. If you use
graphs or tables, place them between the body of the paper and the
“References”
section. It doesn’t make sense to use graphs or tables unless you
refer
to them in the body of the paper. Make sure that all of your sources
are cited in the
paper; make
sure that all of the sources cited in the paper appear in your
"References" section at the back of the paper. If you list a
resoure from the Internet in the "References" section, then you must
include the date that you accessed that source. Failure to follow
the instructions in this step could result in a “U”
in the
class.
7. Print the paper. Read the paper, looking for spelling and
other
mistakes (technical and analytical). Revise. Aim for technical
perfection
- I expect the paper to be free of spelling, punctuation, and other
‘technical’
errors.
8. Re-print, re-read, re-vise. Aim for technical perfection - I
expect the
paper to be free of spelling, punctuation, and other ‘technical’
errors.
9. Print final version. Aim for technical perfection. The
paper
should have a title page, the body of the paper, and a “References”
section
that lists all of the sources cited in the paper. Sources in the
“References” section should be alphabetized, following the ‘author,
date,
title’ format. Beginning with the first page of the paper, pages should
be
numbered. The title page should not be numbered. The
“References" section should not begin at the bottom of the last page of
the body of the text. Rather, the "References" section should
start at the top of a new page. Make two copies of the research
paper:
one for you and one for me.
Guidelines
for Written
Work
Your paper should be
free of spelling and punctuation
errors. If there are five or more spelling or punctuation errors,
then
the paper may not receive an "A." Generally speaking, the more
numerous the spelling and punctuation errors, the lower the
grade. Other
characteristics that are important: clarity of writing, organization,
originality, analysis, and sentence
and paragraph structure. Word choice can also affect the grade on
the paper.
Here are the
directions for obtaining "Off campus access to library resources" http://www.fhsu.edu/forsyth_lib/offcampus.shtml
Here is the
library's page with links to search engines http://www.fhsu.edu/forsyth_lib/searchengine.shtml
Here is the
website for digital libraries http://www.fhsu.edu/forsyth_lib/digital.shtml
Abramson,
Bruce D. October 2007. The
Secret Circuit: The Little-Known Court Where the Rules of the
Information Age Unfold. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN:
0-7425-5281
Baker,
John C., Beth
E. Lachman, Dave R. Frelinger, Kevin M. O'Connell, Alexander Hou,
Michael S.
Tseng, David Orletsky, Charles Yost. 2004. Mapping the Risks
Assessing
the Homeland Security Implications of Publicly Available Geospatial
Information.
Balkovich,
Edward,
Tora K. Bikson, Gordon Bitko. 2005. 9 to 5: Do You Know If Your
Boss Knows
Where You Are? Case Studies of Radio Frequency Identification Usage in
the
Workplace.
Cammaerts,
Bart and Leo Van Audenhove. 2003. ICT-Usage among Trans-national
Social Movements in the Networked Society: To Organize, to Mediate
& to Influence, Key Deliverable The European Media and
Technology in Everyday Life Network, 2000-2003.
http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/EMTEL/reports/cammaerts_2003_emtel.pdf
Cammaerts,
Bart and Nico Carpentier, eds. 2007. Reclaiming the Media:
Communication Rights and Democratic Media Roles. European
Communication Research and Education Association Research Series.
Bristol, UK and Chicago: Intellect.
Caplan,
Arthur L. December 2007. Smart
Mice, Not so Smart People: An Interesting and Amusing Guide to Bioethics.
Rowman & Litlefield. ISBN: 0-7425-4175-x
Carona, Leonel, Jerome Doutriax,
and Sarfraz A. Mian. 2006. Building
Knowledge Regions in North America Emerging Technology Innovation
Poles. Edward Elgar. ISBN: 1-84542-430-5
Cammaerts. Bart and Nico
Carpentier, eds. 2007. Reclaiming
the Media: Communication rights and democratic media roles.
Bristol, UK and Chicago: Intellect.. ISBN: 978--84150-163-5
Castells, Manuel, editor. 2005. The Network Society: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Edward Elgar
Publishing. ISBN:
1-84542-435-2 (paperback).
Chadwick, Andrew. 2006. Internet Politics States,
Citizens, and New Communication Technologies. Oxford University
Press.
Christou, George and Seamus Simpson. 2007. The New Electronic Marketplace:
European Governance Strategies in a Globalizing Economy. Edward
Elgar Publishing. ISBN: 978-1-84542-274-5. $100.00
Dean, Jodi, Jon Anderson, and Lovink Geert,
eds. 2006. Reformatting
Politics Information Technology and Global Civil Society.
Routledge. ISBN: 0-415-95298-0
Drori, Gili. 2005. Global E-Litism: Digital
Technology, Social Inequality, and Transnationality. Worth
Publishers. ISBN: 0716756730 [relevant to the digital divide]
Etc group. January 2007. "Extreme
Genetic Engineering An Introduction to Synthetic Biology."
http://www.etcgroup.org/upload/publication/602/01/synbioreportweb.pdf
Florini, Ann, ed.. 2007. The Right to Know:
Transparency for an Open World. Columbia University Press. ISBN:
978-0-231-14158-1
Gorman, Sean P. 2005. Networks, Security and
Complexity The Role of Public Policy in Critical Infrastructure
Protection. Edward Elgar. ISBN: 1-84376-952-2
Hafkin, Nancy and Sphia Huyer. 2006.
Cinderalla or
Cyberella? Empowering Women in the Knowledge Society.
Kumarian Press. ISBN 978-1-56549-219-6
Hern, Greg and David Rooney, eds. January
2008. Knowledge Policy:
Challenges for the 21st Century. Edward Elgar Publishing. SIBN:
978-1-84542-186-1. $90.00
Henderson, Jason and
Bridget Abraham. 2004. “Can Rural
Naam,
Ramez. 2005. More
Than Human: Embracing the Promise of Biological Enhancement.
Broadway.
ISBN: 0767918436
Norris,
Pippa.
February 2004. Building Knowledge Societies: The
Renewal of Democratic Practices in Knowledge Societies.
UNESCO
World Report. http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~pnorris/Acrobat/UNESCO%20Report%20Knowledge%20Societies.pdf
[relevant to the digital divide]
Phillips,
Peter W.B. 2007. Governing
Transformative Technological Innovation: Who's in Charge? Edward
Elgar Publishing. ISBN: 978-1-84720-237-6. $135.00
Roco,
Mihail and
William Sims Bainbridge, eds. June 2002. Converging Technologies
for
Improving Human Performance:
Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology, and
Cognitive
Science. National Science Foundation/Department of Commerce –
sponsored
report.
Nikolas
Rose. 2006? The Politics of
Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the
Twenty-First Century. Princeton University Press. ISBN:
0-691-12191-5
Rooney,
David and Abraham Ninan, eds. 2005. Handbook on the Knowledge Economy.
Edward Elgar. ISBN: 1-84542-684-3
Servaes,
Jan and Nico Carpentier, eds. Towards
a Sustainable Information Society: Deconstructing WSIS. European Consortium for Communications
Research Series. Bristol, UK and Portland: Intellect. The
acronym "WSIS" stands for "World Summit on the Information
Society." Reviewed at
http://rccs.usfca.edu/bookinfo.asp?ReviewID=435&BookID=315
The Task Force on the Future of American Innovation.
UNESCO World Report. 2005. Towards Knowledge Societies.
Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001418/141843e.pdf
WIPO, “Online Forum on Intellectual Property in the
Information Society” http://www.wipo.int/ipisforum/en/
The World Social Forum http://www.forumsocialmundial.org.br/index.php?cd_language=2
The World Summit on the
Information Society http://www.itu.int/wsis/index.html
Notes on other books.
Andrew A. Adams and Rachel J. McCrindle. 2008. Pandora's Box: Social and
Professional Issues in the Information Age. Chichester,
England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. [Comment: This book is
targeted at undergraduate students in computing. However, given
the breadth of topics covered in the book, it may nevertheless be a
good choice. Plus it is a 2008 publication]
Manuel Castells, Mireia Fernández-Ardèvol, Jack Linchuan Qiu, and
Araba Sey. 2007. Mobile
Communication and Society: A Global Perspective. A Project of
the Annenberg Research Network on International Communication.
Cambridge, MA and London: The MIT Press. ISBN: 0-262-03355-0. [The last
chapter would be good to include in an edited volume.]
Aaron Barlow. 2007. The Rise
of the Blogosphere. Westport, CN and London: Praeger. ISBN:
0-278-98996-8 [Comment: this book's historical perspective makes it a
good candidate for IDS 803.]
Robin Mansell and Brian S. Collins, eds. 2005. Trust and Crime in Information
Societies. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
ISBN: 1-84542-177-9
Catherine McKercher and Vincent Mosco, eds.2007. Knowledge Workers in the
Information Society. Critical Media Studies series editor Andrew
Calabrese. Lanham and Boulder: Lexington Books, a division of Rowman
& Littlefield Publishers, Inc. [The focus on 'labor' - as in 'labor
unions' - makes this book too narrowly focused for IDS 803]
Mark Poster. 2006. Information
Please: Culture and Politics in the Age of the Digital Machines.
Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press. ISBN: 0-8223-3839-4 [the
very beginning is promising - but then drops off precipitously]
Sverker Sörlin and Hebe Vessuri, eds. 2007. Knowledge Society vs. Knowledge
Economy: Knowledge, Power, and Politics. New York: Palgrave
Macmillan. [not for IDS 803]